Ex Parte Yamada - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-0697                                                         
          Application No. 09/625,857                                                   

               Representative claim 21 reads as follows:                               
               21.  A batch-type kiln, comprising:                                     
               (a) a kiln body;                                                        
               (b) a heating chamber disposed within the kiln body, the                
          heating chamber having a heater disposed therein;                            
               (c) a table disposed at the bottom of the heating chamber,              
          the table having a peripheral portion and an upper surface for               
          supporting an object to be treated, the peripheral portion of the            
          table and a portion of the kiln body defining a gap there                    
          between, the gap forming a gas-introducing path for introducing a            
          gas into the heating chamber, wherein the gap comprises a                    
          horizontal component and a vertical component continuous with                
          each other; and                                                              
               (d) a plurality of gas supply tubes arranged concentrically             
          with respect to the heating chamber for introducing a gas into               
          the heating chamber, each gas supply tube having a plurality of              
          blow openings.                                                               

                                  THE PRIOR ART                                        
               The references relied on by the examiner as evidence of                 
          obviousness are:                                                             
          Okase                         5,329,095       July    12, 1994               
          Shimada et al. (Shimada)      5,383,984       January 24, 1995               

                                    THE REJECTION                                      
               Claims 21 through 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as being unpatentable over Okase in view of Shimada.                         
               Attention is directed to the brief (Paper No. 15) and answer            
          (Paper No. 16) for the respective positions of the appellant and             


                                          2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007