Appeal No. 2002-0697 Application No. 09/625,857 Representative claim 21 reads as follows: 21. A batch-type kiln, comprising: (a) a kiln body; (b) a heating chamber disposed within the kiln body, the heating chamber having a heater disposed therein; (c) a table disposed at the bottom of the heating chamber, the table having a peripheral portion and an upper surface for supporting an object to be treated, the peripheral portion of the table and a portion of the kiln body defining a gap there between, the gap forming a gas-introducing path for introducing a gas into the heating chamber, wherein the gap comprises a horizontal component and a vertical component continuous with each other; and (d) a plurality of gas supply tubes arranged concentrically with respect to the heating chamber for introducing a gas into the heating chamber, each gas supply tube having a plurality of blow openings. THE PRIOR ART The references relied on by the examiner as evidence of obviousness are: Okase 5,329,095 July 12, 1994 Shimada et al. (Shimada) 5,383,984 January 24, 1995 THE REJECTION Claims 21 through 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Okase in view of Shimada. Attention is directed to the brief (Paper No. 15) and answer (Paper No. 16) for the respective positions of the appellant and 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007