Appeal No. 2002-0754
Application 09/046,797
elected species. These claims constitute all of the claims
remaining in the application.
Appellant’s invention pertains to an unpowered road luge and
an unpowered road luge used by a reclining rider. A basic
understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of
exemplary claims 1, 17, and 21, respective copies of which appear
in the APPENDIX to the main brief (Paper No. 21).
As evidence of anticipation and obviousness, the examiner
has applied the documents listed below:
Matsuura 3,913,929 Oct. 21, 1975
Wiener 4,548,421 Oct. 22, 1985
Dean et al 4,592,563 Jun. 3, 1986
(Dean)
Eilers 4,993,733 Feb. 19, 1991
Shoquist 5,785,330 Jul. 28, 1998
The following rejections are before us for review. 1
1 A final rejection of claims 1 through 3, 7, 13 through 16,
and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) based upon the combination of
Carn and Hoffman references was withdrawn by the examiner
(answer, page 2).
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007