Ex Parte LEISTENSNIDER et al - Page 1




                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                       
                               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      

                                                                                    Paper No. 17                       

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                     __________                                                        
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                     __________                                                        
                            Ex parte JAMES LEISTENSNIDER and THOMAS LOOP JR.                                           
                                                     __________                                                        
                                               Appeal No. 2002-0811                                                    
                                             Application No. 09/182,466                                                
                                                     __________                                                        
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                     __________                                                        
              Before THOMAS, KRASS, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
              THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     
                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     Appellants have appealed to the board from the examiner’s final rejection of                      
              claims 1 through 30.                                                                                     
                     Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                                                       
              1.     A computer-implemented method for creating a portfolio of equity stocks,                          
              comprising the steps of:                                                                                 
                     determining the composition of a predetermined broadbased stock index by                          
              accessing a database and creating a list of the stocks making up said index;                             
                     obtaining from said database for each stock in said index, data relating to at least              
              earnings, dividend yield and the economic sector of the company issuing the stock;                       








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007