Ex Parte KIM et al - Page 8

          Appeal No. 2002-0857                                                         
          Application No. 09219,876                                                    


          displayed when the password dialog box is displayed and subject              
          to a second particular input being detected.                                 
               Since Atick does not remedy the deficiency of Franklin,                 
          Atick being applied for a teaching of image recognition software,            
          we also will not sustain the rejection of claims 5, 6, 9 and 10              
          under 35 U.S.C. 103.                                                         
               The examiner’s decision is reversed.                                    
                                       REVERSED                                        







                         JAMES D. THOMAS                )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                         ERROL A. KRASS                 ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )   APPEALS AND                
                                                        )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                         ANITA PELLMAN GROSS            )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )                              





                                         -8–                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007