Ex Parte IIDA et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2002-0864                                                         
          Application 09/022,817                                                       

                                                                                      
                                      PRIOR ART                                        
                    The examiner relies on the following prior art                     
          references:1                                                                 
                                                                                      
          Kubisa                   DE 42 08 355 A1           Sep. 23, 1993             
          (Published German Patent Application)                                        
                                                                                      
          Tabata et al. (Tabata) JP 6-126134-A               May  10, 1994             
          (Published Japanese Patent Application)                                      
          Kato et al. (Kato)       JP 6-319950-A             Nov. 22, 1994             
          (Published Japanese Patent Application)                                      
          Appellants’ admission at pages 2 and 3 of the specification in               
          reference to prior art Figure 3 (hereinafter referred to as                  
          “admitted prior art”).                                                       
                    The appellants rely on the following literature:                   
          Jumpei Ando, “Review of Japanese NOx Abatement Technology for                
          Stationary Sources,” NOx-Symposium Karlsruhe 1985, pp. A1-A42                
          (hereinafter referred to as “Ando”).                                         
                                                                                      
                                      REJECTION                                        
                    Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as             
          unpatentable over the combined teachings of the admitted prior               
          art, Kubisa, Kato and Tabata.                                                
                   We reverse.                                                        



               1 Our reference to the published German and Japanese patent             
          applications is to their corresponding English translations of               
          record.                                                                      
                                           3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007