Ex Parte KARASAWA et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2002-0876                                                          Page 2              
            Application No. 09/267,140                                                                        


                         a plurality of arms, each arm including series connected first and second            
            switching devices, first and second freewheeling diodes respectively connected in                 
            antiparallel with said first and second switching devices, a phase capacitor connected in         
            parallel with the series connected first and second switching devices, and an arm output          
            providing a separate phase voltage for each arm;                                                  
                         a DC power source connected between a DC positive bus and a DC                       
            negative bus; and                                                                                 
                         a filter capacitor connected between said DC positive bus at a DC positive           
            bus connection and said DC negative bus at a DC negative bus connection,                          
                         wherein each of said arms is individually connected to said DC positive              
            bus connection and said DC negative bus connection so as to reduce fluctuations in                
            each said separate phase voltage.                                                                 

                   The examiner relies on the following reference:                                            
            Nishizawa et al. (Nishizawa)    5,132,896          July 21, 1992                                  
            The admitted prior art described in appellants’ specification.                                    
                   Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the               
            admitted prior art.  Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                    
            anticipated by the disclosure of Nishizawa.  All the examiner’s previous rejections under         
            35 U.S.C. § 103 have been withdrawn by the examiner [answer, page 5].                             
                   Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the examiner, we make                    
            reference to the briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof.                        




                                                  OPINION                                                     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007