Ex Parte FASSLER et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-0881                                                        
          Application No. 09/169,071                                                  


                               APPEALED SUBJECT MATTER                                
               Claim 6 is representative of the subject matter on appeal              
          and reads as follows:                                                       
                         6.     An inkjet printhead including a cleaning              
               structure defining:                                                    
               a)     an outlet orifice plate having a plurality                      
               of orifices for ejecting ink droplets and having a surface             
               formed of material including silver or gold;                           

                    b)     means defining a pumping cavity in                         
               communication with the orifices for receiving ink and                  
               formed, at least in part, of a piezo electric material                 
               which, when energized, squeezes the pumping cavity to eject            
               ink through the orifice; and                                           
                         c)     a cleaning station including means for                
               applying a cleaning liquid to clean the orifice plate, such            
               cleaning liquid including a hydrophobic additive in the                
               liquid having a strong affinity for the material which forms           
               the orifice surface and coats such surface to form a                   
               protective coating of such additive so that if a portion of            
               the protective coating is removed, such portion will be                
               repaired by the additive material.                                     
                                PRIOR ART REFERENCES                                  
               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies on the                 
          following prior art references:                                             
          Takahashi et al. (Takahashi) 5,005,024            Apr. 2, 1991              
          Ochiai et al. (Ochiai)        5,311,218           May 10, 1994              
          Nakazawa et al. (Nakazawa)    5,397,386           Mar. 14, 1995             
          Halko et al. (Halko)          5,598,193           Jan. 28, 1997             




                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007