Ex Parte Zhong et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-0932                                                        
          Application No. 09/510,533                                                  


          includes a method of electrolessly plating a nodule-free,                   
          amorphous nickel-phosphorus (NiP) layer on a substrate surface              
          (Brief, page 3).1  Illustrative independent claim 1 is reproduced           
          below:                                                                      
               1.    A method of depositing a nodule-free, amorphous                  
               nickel-phosphorus (NiP) coating layer on a substrate                   
               surface by means of an electroless plating process,                    
               wherein an electroless plating bath utilized for                       
               depositing said coating layer is contained at an                       
               elevated temperature within a plating apparatus                        
               including at least one polymeric material, comprising                  
               performing said electroless plating in a plating                       
               apparatus wherein the at least one polymeric material                  
               is substantially resistant to degradation by contact                   
               with the elevated temperature electroless plating bath.                
               The examiner has relied upon the following references as               
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Katz                          3,348,969          Oct. 24, 1967              
          Malik et al. (Malik)          4,659,605          Apr. 21, 1987              
          Chen et al. (Chen)            5,733,370          Mar. 31, 1998              
          Chiu                          6,153,802          Nov. 28, 2000              
                                                  (filed May  08, 1998)               
               Claims 1, 3-4, 7-8, 11-13 and 19 stand rejected under                  
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Chen in view of Katz                
          (Answer, page 3).  Claims 2, 14-16 and 18 stand rejected under              





               1All citations from the Brief refer to the Substitute Brief            
          dated May 24, 2001, Paper No. 11.                                           
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007