Ex Parte Healy et al - Page 4




              Appeal No. 2002-0955                                                                Page 4                
              Application No. 09/511,921                                                                                


              Kilgore’s support elements 332 differ from an “ellipsoidal” shape by virtue of the                        
              flattenings on top and bottom and the central top and bottom recesses.  The                               
              terminology “generally ellipsoidal,” however, encompasses not only ellipsoidal shapes                     
              but also shapes which are close to ellipsoidal but differ to some degree from ellipsoidal.                
              Thus, the dispositive issue in the appeal of the rejection of claims 4, 21 and 24 is                      
              whether these differences are of such a nature that Kilgore’s support elements 332                        
              cannot reasonably be considered “generally ellipsoidal in shape.”  For the reasons                        
              which follow, we agree with the examiner that the claim terminology “generally                            
              ellipsoidal in shape” as used by appellants is sufficiently broad to encompass the shape                  
              of Kilgore’s support elements 332.                                                                        
                     Consistent with Seattle Box Company, Inc. v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc.,                   
              731 F.2d 818, 826, 221 USPQ 568, 573-74 (Fed. Cir. 1984), we look to appellants’                          
              specification to see what is meant by “generally ellipsoidal.”  With regard to this shape                 
              limitation, appellants’ specification (page 6) informs us that                                            
                            [t]he geometry of the shock-absorber elements 44 is also                                    
                            important.  The vertical and shear forces applied to the                                    
                            shock-absorber elements 44 during use of an athletic shoe                                   
                            often exceed twice the wearer’s body weight.  Therefore, the                                
                            shape is preferably conducive to resisting these forces.                                    
                            Shapes that allow the shock-absorber elements 44 to bend                                    
                            or kink are undesirable, as bending or kinking would reduce                                 
                            the resiliency and energy return of the system.  Preferably,                                
                            each shock-absorber element 44 in horizontal cross-section                                  
                            is generally circular in shape.  More preferably, each shock-                               
                            absorber element 44 is generally ellipsoidal in shape and                                   
                            more preferably is generally spherical in shape.  A sphere or                               
                            ball-shaped shock-absorber element 44 provide improved                                      
                            response to vertical and shear loading.  The sphere will not                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007