Appeal No. 2002-0956
Application 09/182,366
subject matter recited in parent claim 1, we also shall not
sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent
claim 8 as being unpatentable over Spengler in view of Mattison,
the British reference, the German reference and Heynhold.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 4, 6
through 12, 14 and 15 is reversed.
REVERSED
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
)
) APPEALS AND
JOHN P. MCQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
)
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JPM/kis
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007