Ex Parte CABREY - Page 1




        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not            
        written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.            
                                                               Paper No. 10           

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte JENNIFER M. CABREY                              
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2002-0983                                  
                             Application No. 09/399,890                               
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before LIEBERMAN, DELMENDO, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative            
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                  
          (2002) from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through              
          8, which are all of the claims pending in the above-identified              
          application.                                                                
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a laminate                     
          composite material having a water vapor transmission rate (WVTR)            
          exceeding 1 perm (grains/hr ft2 in Hg).  According to the                   
          appellant, the claimed laminate composite material substantially            







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007