Appeal No. 2002-1002 Application No. 08/820,506 Grounds of Rejection 1. Claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by McCord. We affirm. 2. Claims 14 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over McCord. We affirm as to claim 14 and reverse as to claim 16. 3. Claim 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over McCord in view of Pecora. We reverse. 4. Claims 14-16 and 18-19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Lochner. We affirm as to claim 14 and reverse as to claims 15, 16, 18 and 19. Background The invention relates to a car washing element of the type used in circular and cylindrical brushes as well as hanging strip “Mitter Curtain” devices. Appeal brief2, page 1, Summary of the Invention. According to appellant, “[t]he claimed device is distinguished from all other car wash elements by the fact that 2 All references herein refer to appellants’ twice amended Appeal brief, paper no. 24, filed March 21, 2001. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007