Ex Parte OKOCHI et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1059                                                        
          Application No. 09/051,933                                                  

          comprises a particulate carbon material of artificial graphite              
          which has a volume resistivity not exceeding 5.0 x 10-3ohm.cm               
          wherein the filling density of the particulate carbon material              
          ranges from 1.2 to 1.40 g/cc.  According to the appellants’                 
          specification, a lithium ion secondary battery which contains               
          such a negative electrode exhibits the desirable characteristic             
          of relatively low heat generation when internal short-circuiting            
          takes place.  This appealed subject matter is adequately                    
          illustrated by independent claim 17 which reads as follows:                 
               17. A negative electrode for a lithium secondary battery,              
          the electrode comprising a particulate carbon material enabling             
          the absorption and release of lithium ions, and a binder;                   
               in which:                                                              
               the particulate carbon material is artificial graphite;                
               the particulate carbon material has a volume resistivity not           
          exceeding 5.0 x 10-3ohm.cm; and                                             
               the filling density of the particulate carbon material                 
          ranges from 1.2 to 1.40 g/cc.                                               
               The reference set forth below is relied upon by the examiner           
          as evidence of obviousness:                                                 
          Takami et al. (Takami)        5,340,670           Aug. 23, 1994             
               All of the claims on appeal are rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Takami.                                 



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007