Ex Parte BURGESS - Page 18




                Appeal No. 2002-1080                                                                                 18                 
                Application No. 09/372,149                                                                                              


                discussed supra in our treatment of claim 2, we do not agree.  Thus, we shall sustain                                   
                the standing rejection of claim 22.                                                                                     
                        Claim 23 depends from claim 22 and adds that the thickness of the resilient                                     
                sheet member is about 2mm.  In this instance, our discussion supra in our treatment of                                  
                claim 3 applies.  For the reasons explained in that discussion, we shall not sustain the                                
                rejection of claim 23.                                                                                                  
































Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007