Ex Parte PATTERSON et al - Page 1





               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
                    today was not written for publication and is                      
                         not binding precedent of the Board                           
                                                       Paper No. 12                   
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
          _______________                                                             
                                                                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                             Ex parte CHAD PATTERSON and                              
                                   JOEL A. SINGER                                     
                                   ______________                                     
                                   Appeal No. 2002–1087                               
                              Application 09/320,104                                  
                                   _______________                                    
                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                   _______________                                    
          Before COHEN, ABRAMS and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                                                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final                 
          rejection of claims 1, 3, 5, 6 and 9-11, the claims currently               
          pending in the application.                                                 
               Appellants’ invention pertains to a pair of outsoles for               
          golf shoes that are designed to improve traction of the golfer’s            
          feet as weight is shifted from the back foot to the forward foot            
          as downswing of a golf club progresses.  More particularly, the             
          outsole of the golf shoe of the back foot is provided with flared           
          portions on the medial side of the heel portion thereof, and the            
                                         1–                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007