Appeal No. 2002-1117 Application No. 09/569,607 claimed graft connector is exemplified by that depicted in Figure 22 of the application and described on page 20 of the specification. Independent claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and a copy of that claim can be found in Appendix A of appellants' brief. The sole prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is: Berg et al. (Berg '416) 6,074,416 Jun. 13, 2000 Claims 1 through 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Berg '416. Rather than reiterate the examiner's full commentary regarding the above-noted rejection and the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and appellants regarding the rejection, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 12, mailed April 5, 2002) for the reasoning in support of the rejection, and to appellants' brief (Paper No. 11, filed March 21, 2002) and reply brief (Paper No. 13, filed June 10, 2002) for the arguments thereagainst. 22Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007