Appeal No. 2002-1173 Application No. 09/510,640 In re Paulsen, 30 F.3d 1475, 1478-79, 31 USPQ2d 1671, 1673 (Fed. Cir. 1994). Anticipation is established only when a single prior art reference discloses, expressly or under the principles of inherency, each and every element of a claimed invention as well as disclosing structure which is capable of performing the recited functional limitations. RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Sys. Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Upon a review of Hsieh, we agree with Appellants that the reference fails to teach replicating the operations performed prior to the reset signal. The power supply voltage sensing circuit of Hsieh generates a reset signal not only when the power supply voltage is first applied to the circuit, but also when the power supply voltage level falls below a selected value (col. 1, lines 11-14). The reset signal holds the integrated circuit in a known state until the power supply voltage returns to its selected value where the integrated circuit may function reliably (col. 4, lines 3-9). This arrangement differs from the claimed “repeating operations of the integrated circuit which ... have (possibly) been influenced by the dip in the supply voltage” since the reset signal of Hsieh, similar to its power-on reset, clears all the data to the initial state and waits for the next 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007