Appeal No. 2002-1190 Application No. 09/023,470 Brief cannot take the place of objective evidence. In re Pearson, 494 F.2d 1399, 1405, 181 USPQ 641, 646 (CCPA 1974). Concerning appellants' reference to "the practice in the European Patent Office" (page 6 of Brief, penultimate paragraph), such practice has no bearing on proceedings before this Board. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) THOMAS A. WALTZ ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JAMES T. MOORE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ECK:clm -5-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007