Ex Parte GROSSMANN - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2002-1267                                                                  Page 2                
              Application No. 09/333,928                                                                                  


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     The appellant's invention relates to tools for folding sheet-like blanks around                      
              block-shaped commodities in wrapping machines (title).  A copy of the dependent                             
              claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief.  Claim 1, the                    
              only independent claim on appeal, reads as follows:                                                         
                            A tool for conversion of discrete deformable blanks into envelopes for                        
                     block shaped commodities, comprising                                                                 
                            at least one lightweight carrier having at least one active surface shaped                    
                     to deform a blank; and                                                                               
                            at least one wear-resistant liner covering and in contact with said active                    
                     surface,                                                                                             
                            said liner having a blank deforming surface adjacent to the active surface                    
                     of said carrier,                                                                                     
                            said liner comprising a different material than said carrier.                                 


                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                      
              appealed claims are:                                                                                        
              Adams et al. (Adams)                5,249,416                           Oct. 5, 1993                        
              Focke et al. (Focke)                5,588,286                           Dec. 31, 1996                       
              Spada et al. (Spada)                5,653,086                           Aug. 5, 1997                        


                     Claims 1 to 6, 8, 9 and 18 to 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                       
              unpatentable over Spada in view of Focke.                                                                   











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007