Ex Parte MITTS et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2002-1306                                                                                       
              Application No. 08/993,321                                                                                 


              topologies, the instant invention utilizes a dynamic anchor node assignment.  Any of the                   
              switches in the tree topology may be assigned as an anchor node and this switch will                       
              control the routing of the network, the routing starting from that switch.                                 
                     Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                        
                     1.  A network-structured telecommunications network comprising switches                             
                     and data transmission connections there between, where at least a                                   
                     certain number of the switches are arranged to control the routing of the                           
                     connections in the telecommunications network according to a plurality of                           
                     predetermined tree topologies, characterised in that each of the certain                            
                     number of switches belonging to  said plurality of predetermined tree                               
                     topologies is arranged to serve as an anchor node of the plurality of                               
                     predetermined tree topologies during routing and that a subset of the                               
                     certain number of switches are provided with functions supporting wireless                          
                     terminals.                                                                                          
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                    
                     Chen et al. (Chen)          5,831,975             Nov. 03, 1998                                     
                                                        (filed Apr. 04, 1996)                                            
                     Katzela et al. (Katzela)    5,872,773             Feb. 16, 1999                                     
                                                                (filed May 17, 1996)                                     
                     Claims 1, 3-8 and 10-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable                        
              over Katzela in view of Chen.                                                                              
                     Reference is made to the briefs1 and answer for the respective positions of                         
              appellants and the examiner.                                                                               




                     1 Supplemental brief of Mar. 19, 2001 and reply brief of Aug. 15, 2001.                             
                                                           2                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007