Ex Parte BLUME - Page 2


                Appeal No.  2002-1361                                                 Page 2                  
                Application No. 09/476,822                                                                    

                         (c) acidifying said oral liquid sample in said collection container such             
                             that the pH of said oral liquid sample is below about 5.0 but above              
                             about 2.5,                                                                       
                         (d) contacting said oral liquid sample in said collection container with a           
                             urease detecting pad containing urease substrate,                                
                         (e) observing said urease detecting pad for a color change or lack of                
                             color change, and                                                                
                         (f) correlating said color change or lack of color change with presence              
                             or absence of Helicobacter Pylori infection in said human,                       
                         whereby said detecting of Helicobacter Pylori infection is performed                 
                         without incubating of said oral liquid sample.                                       
                      Claims 8-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as                   
                being based on a disclosure that is not enabling.  Claims 8-13 also stand                     
                rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing             
                to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter that applicant              
                regards as the invention.  After careful review of the record and consideration of            
                the issues before us, we reverse all of the rejections of record.                             
                                                DISCUSSION                                                    
                      Claims 8-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as                   
                based on a disclosure that is not enabling.                                                   
                      According to the rejection,                                                             
                      [a] number of features are critical or essential to the practice of the                 
                      invention, but not included in the claim[s] is not enabled by the                       
                      disclosure.  In re Mayhew, 527 F.2d 1229, 188 USPQ 356 (CCPA                            
                      1976).                                                                                  










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007