Ex Parte ALFERNESS et al - Page 3




              Appeal No. 2002-1395                                                                     Page 3                 
              Application No. 08/789,702                                                                                      


              expanded using an expander preprocessor.  More specifically, the preprocessor                                   
              incorporates the behavioral description of the template into the behavioral description of                      
              the IC and provides template markers to identify the location of the template.  (Id. at 9.)                     


                      A further understanding of the invention can be achieved by reading the following                       
              claim.                                                                                                          
                             1. A method for providing a behavioral description of a circuit                                  
                      design, the method comprising the steps of:                                                             
                             a. providing a template behavioral description, wherein the                                      
                      template behavioral description models a selected portion of the circuit                                
                      design; and                                                                                             
                             b. instantiating a template call in the behavioral description of the                            
                      circuit design by incorporating the template call into the behavioral                                   
                      description of the circuit design, the template call referencing the                                    
                      corresponding template behavioral description.                                                          


                      Claims 1-51 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2, as indefinite.  Claims 1-                        
              51 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by U.S. Patent                                   
              No. 5,987,239 ("Kirsch").  The same claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                           
              obvious over U.S. Patent No. 5,572,437 ("Rostoker") and U.S. Patent No. 5,625,565                               
              ("Van Dyke").                                                                                                   












Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007