Ex Parte MOORE - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2002-1416                                                        
         Application No. 09/146,519                                                  


               18. A method of filling a surface discontinuity in a                  
         semiconductor product, said method comprising the steps of:                 
               depositing conductive material over said surface                      
         discontinuity;                                                              
               subsequently, applying an explosive force to said conductive          
         material; and                                                               
               deforming said conductive material into said surface                  
         discontinuity, and wherein the deformation of said conductive               
         material into said surface discontinuity is caused by the                   
         application of said explosive force.                                        
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                 
         examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
         Cranston                       3,737,986           Jun. 12, 1973            
         Dobson                         5,527,561           Jun. 18, 1996            
         Jeffryes et al. (Jeffryes)     5,575,850           Nov. 19, 1996            
               Claims 2 through 9, 11, and 18 through 20 stand rejected              
         under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Dobson in view             
         of Cranston.                                                                
               Claims 12 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as          
         being unpatentable over Dobson in view of Cranston and Jeffryes.            
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 20,             
         mailed March 11, 2002) for the examiner's complete reasoning in             
         support of the rejections, and to appellant's Brief (Paper                  
         No. 19, filed December 26, 2001) and Reply Brief (Paper No. 22,             
         filed May 13, 2002) for appellant's arguments thereagainst.                 





                                         2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007