The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DOUGLAS MacGREGOR DEWAR and ALEXANDER F. ANDERSON ____________ Appeal No. 2002-1445 Application No. 09/280,775 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 through 7, 9, 12 through 15, and 18 through 21. These claims constitute all of the claims remaining in the application. Appellants' invention pertains to a heat exchanger. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1, 9, and 18, respective copies of which appear in the APPENDIX to the brief (Paper No. 16).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007