Appeal No. 2002-1464
Application No. 09/213,710
fuel injection system, and a component in a fuel injection
system. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived
from a reading of exemplary claims 1, 15, 24, and 33, respective
copies of which appear in “APPENDIX A” of the “RE-SUBMITTED”
brief (Paper No. 17).
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
Djordjevic Re. 34,956 May 30, 1995
Tsuchiya et al 4,426,162 Jan. 17, 1984
(Tsuchiya)
Little 5,673,618 Oct. 7, 1997
Young 5,773,734 Jun. 30, 1998
The following rejections are before us for review.
Claims 1, 2, 4 through 7, 11 through 14, and 24 through 32
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over Djordjevic in view of Tsuchiya and Young.
Claims 1, 8 through 10, and 33 through 41 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Djordjevic
in view of Tsuchiya and Little.
Claims 15 through 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Djordjevic in view of Tsuchiya, Young,
and Little.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007