Appeal No. 2002-1469 Page 7 Application No. 09/317,110 coupon selection and raincheck generation process, rendering Off et al unsatisfactory for its intended purpose." (Appeal Br. at 10.) The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit "has previously found a proposed modification inappropriate for an obviousness inquiry when the modification rendered the prior art reference inoperable for its intended purpose." In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 126? n.?, 23 USPQ2d 1780, 1783 n.12 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (citing In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902, 221 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1984)). Here, Off's POS system is intended to "generat[e], in a retail store, a printable discount coupon image, solely in response to a customer's action concerning the purchase of an item." Col. 2, ll. 11-14. More specifically, the "generation of a discount coupon for a selected product will be triggered by a customer's action concerning the purchase of a triggering product different from the one for which the coupon is generated. . . ." Id. at ll. 22-25. The appellant fails to show that adding Fajkowski's rainchecking or incentive processor to Off's POS system would have rendered the latter reference unable to generate a printable coupon responsive to a customer's purchase of a triggering product different from the one for which the coupon is generated. To the contrary, we are persuaded that the combination of teachings from the references would be able to both generate a printable coupon responsive to a customer's purchase of a triggering product and toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007