Ex Parte Kazmierczak et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                                 Paper No. 20         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                         Ex parte FREDERICK FRANK KAZMIERCZAK                         
                               and MICHAEL JOHN RAFFETTO                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2002-1477                                 
                              Application No. 09/544,849                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent           
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      




                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of           
          claims 13-22, which are all of the claims pending in the present            
          application.  Since Appellants indicate (Brief, page 1) that the            
          rejection of claims 13 and 16 is not being appealed, the appeal as          
          to those claims is hereby dismissed.  Accordingly, only the                 
          Examiner’s rejection of claims 14, 15, and 17-22 is before us on            
          appeal.                                                                     






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007