Appeal No. 2002-1523
Application 09/524,811
art, or any viable line of reasoning as to why such artisan would
have otherwise found the claimed subject matter to have been
obvious in light of the teachings of the applied Arnold patent,
we must refuse to sustain the examiner's rejection of claims 1
through 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
Accordingly, the decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CEF:psb
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007