Appeal No. 2002-1547 Page 8 Application No. 09/259,434 invention as those of the patent, a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for double patenting would be appropriate. Summary The cited reference does not teach or suggest any method for making the claimed composition, comprising Apo AI-M dimers “purified to at least 90% homogeneity.” Therefore, the reference supports at best an “obvious to try” rationale, which is insufficient to show obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The examiner’s rejection is reversed. REVERSED SHERMAN D. WINTERS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ERIC GRIMES ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) LORA M. GREEN ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007