Appeal No. 2002-1548
Application No. 09/408,042
In summary, we note that the decision of the examiner to
reject claims 1, 3 through 8, 11 through 14 and 16 through 20
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Dominguez has
not been sustained. In addition, the decision of the examiner to
reject dependent claim 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) has not been
sustained. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner is
reversed.
REVERSED
Irwin Charles Cohen )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Neal E. Abrams )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Charles E. Frankfort )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CEF/eld
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007