Appeal No. 2002-1550 Application No. 09/158,884 peak and valley count within a window containing the pixel to be classified, and the local roughness. Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows: 1. An apparatus for classifying image data comprising: an input device that receives the image data; a peak/valley detection device that receives the image data and determines one of a peak count and a valley count within a window of the image data around a pixel under consideration, wherein the window includes a plurality of subwindows, and the peak/valley detection device detects the greater of the peak count and the valley count for each subwindow; and a classification device that determines a class of the pixel under consideration based on the greatest of the peak counts of the peaks within the subwindows and the valley counts of the valleys within the subwindows. The examiner relies on the following reference: Ohuchi 5,025,481 Jun. 18, 1991 Claims 1-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §102 (b) as anticipated by Ohuchi. Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the respective positions of appellants and the examiner. OPINION Anticipation is established only when a single prior art reference discloses, expressly or under the principles of inherency, each and every element of a claimed 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007