Ex Parte EL-KASSOUF - Page 3




             Appeal No. 2002-1569                                                               Page 3                
             Application No. 09/356,431                                                                               


                    The appellant’s invention is an improvement to wet disc brake assemblies.  It                     
             utilizes in the brake housing a fluid which changes its viscosity upon application of                    
             electric current thereto, in order to increase the drag upon the brake discs and thus                    
             provide braking force.  Claim 1 sets forth the invention in the following manner.                        
                    1.   A reduced drag wet disc brake assembly comprising:                                           
                    a brake housing defining a cavity;                                                                
                    a hub rotatingly connected to said brake housing;                                                 
                    at least one rotating plate disposed within said cavity and rotatingly                            
                    connected to said hub;                                                                            
                    at least one non-rotating plate disposed within said cavity adjacent said at                      
                    least one rotating plate and connected to said brake housing;                                     
                    a current source selectively connected to said housing; and                                       
                    a fluid filling said cavity which has a viscosity that can be controlled by                       
                    application of said current source.                                                               
                    Looking first to independent claim 1, the examiner is of the view that Heidenreich                
             discloses all of the subject matter recited except for the current source and the fluid that             
             has a viscosity controlled by the application of current.  However, the examiner’s                       
             position is that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify                
             the Heidenreich system by replacing the fluid disclosed therein with the claimed current                 
             responsive fluid in view of the teachings of Daniels.  The appellant has provided several                
             arguments in opposition to this conclusion, including the assertion that Daniels is not                  
             analogous art, that the examiner’s understanding of the teachings of Daniels is not                      







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007