Ex Parte WAGNER et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                                                                 Paper No. 16         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                       Ex parte GREGG WAGNER and ROBERT STEWART                       
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2002-1573                                 
                              Application No. 09/113,446                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  

               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 6                 
          through 11.  Claims 1 through 5 stand withdrawn.  These claims              
          constitute all of the claims remaining in the application.                  

               Appellants' invention pertains to a housing for a portable             
          handheld electronic reader/scanner.  A basic understanding of the           
          invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 6, a             
          copy of which appears in the APPENDIX to the main brief                     
          (Paper No. 10).                                                             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007