Ex Parte SARDOY et al - Page 1




                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered             
                           today was not written for publication and                  
                             is not binding precedent of the Board                    
                                                       Paper No. 26                   
                                                                                     
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte VERONIQUE SARDOY,                               
                         GILLES DAHMEN, ISABELLE POISSONNET,                          
                           ANNE BLANCHARD, PASCAL CHOQUET                             
                                AND BERNARD DEBIESME                                  
                                     ___________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2002-1609                                  
                             Application No. 09/129,238                               
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before GARRIS, PAWLIKOWSKI, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     

          PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s            
          final rejection of claims 8-17, 19, and 21.                                 
               Claim 8 is representative of the subject matter on appeal,             
          and is set forth below:                                                     
               8.  Process for producing a thin sheet of ultra-low-carbon             
          steel, said process comprising:                                             
               -producing a killed and vacuum-degassed steel comprising, by           
          weight, between 0.10 and 0.35% manganese, less than 0.006%                  
          nitrogen, less than 0.025% phosphorus, less than 0.020% sulphur,            
          less than 0.02% silicon, a total amount of the elements copper,             







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007