The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte AUDREY A. SHERMAN, MIECZYSLAW H. MAZUREK, WALTER R. ROMANKO,
PATRICK D. HYDE, ROY WONG, and ALBERT I. EVERERTS
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1622
Application No. 08/735,836
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, TIMM, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Claims 1, 3, 6, 21, 24-26, and 38-57 are currently pending in the Application. Claims
43-49 stand allowed by the Examiner. Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner
finally rejecting claims 1, 3, 6, 21, 24-26, 38-42, 50-57. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007