Ex Parte DEE et al - Page 1


                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    
                                                                                 Paper No. 41                 
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                __________                                                    
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                    
                             Ex parte ALEJANDRO DEE and CHARLES GRADLE                                        
                                                __________                                                    
                                            Appeal No. 2002-1644                                              
                                         Application No. 08/602,498                                           
                                                __________                                                    
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                __________                                                    
                Before WINTERS, ADAMS and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
                ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           
                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                         
                examiner’s final rejection of claims 14-16 and 21-24 which are all the claims                 
                pending in the application.1                                                                  
                      Claims 14 and 21 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and are               
                reproduced below:                                                                             
                      14. A method of preventing mastitis in a dairy animal, comprising the step              
                          of topically applying an antimicrobial composition to the teats of the              
                          animal, the composition consisting essentially of (1) from about 60%                
                          to about 95% of a lipophilic polar solvent selected from the group                  
                          consisting of propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, glycerol, and                      
                          isopropanol, by weight of the composition, and (2) at least two C8 to               
                                                                                                              
                1 We note that the Appendix of claims on appeal attached to the Brief, includes claims 17-20. 
                However, as appellants explain (Brief, page 2), these claims together with claims 1-7 and 9-12
                “were cancelled pursuant to a restriction requirement and are currently pending in U.S. Application
                Serial No. 09/586,860….”  Accordingly, we have not considered claims 17-20 as part of this    
                appeal.                                                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007