Appeal No. 2002-1649 Page 6
Application No. 09/405,781
Dimitrik does not remedy the deficiencies of Goswami. We conclude that the Examiner
has failed to establish a prima facie case of unpatentability with respect to the subject matter of
claims 1-15.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1 and 3-14 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(e) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) and 2, 10, 11, 13-15
and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007