Appeal No. 2002-1689 Application No. 08/796,285 Page 2 30. Decoding apparatus comprising, a first decoder having a first input for receiving a first transmitted signal and a second input for receiving a second transmitted signal, a first output for normally providing a first output signal, a second output for normally providing a second output signal and a third output for normally providing a third output signal, and a second decoder having a first input for normally receiving a first transmitted signal coupled to the first output of said first decoder, a second input for normally receiving a second transmitted signal coupled to the second output of said first decoder, a first output for providing a second first output signal, a second output for providing a second second output signal and a third output for providing a second third output signal. The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting appealed claim 30 is: Embree 5,642,423 June 24, 1997 Claims 30-32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite. Claim 30 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Embree. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and appellant regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 22, mailed June 5, 2001) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejections, and to appellant's brief (Paper No. 21, filedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007