The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte S. ELWOOD YANDLE ____________ Appeal No. 2002-1720 Application No. 09/100,494 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before STAAB, MCQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 11-15, 17 and 20-33, which are all of the claims pending in this application. BACKGROUND The appellant’s invention relates to a weed trimmer which uses recycled coat hangers and common nails as blades (specification, page 1). Further understanding of the invention may be obtained from a reading of claim 11, which is reproduced, infra, in the opinion section of this decision.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007