Ex Parte YANDLE II - Page 1




                               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                   
                                written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                  

                                                                                           Paper No. 29             

                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                                   ____________                                                     
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                     
                                           Ex parte S. ELWOOD YANDLE                                                
                                                   ____________                                                     
                                               Appeal No. 2002-1720                                                 
                                             Application No. 09/100,494                                             
                                                   ____________                                                     
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                   ____________                                                     
             Before STAAB, MCQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
             BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     



                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                    This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 11-15,               
             17 and 20-33, which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                 
                                                 BACKGROUND                                                         
                    The appellant’s invention relates to a weed trimmer which uses recycled coat                    
             hangers and common nails as blades (specification, page 1).  Further understanding of                  
             the invention may be obtained from a reading of claim 11, which is reproduced, infra, in               
             the opinion section of this decision.                                                                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007