Appeal No. 2002-1734 Application 09/399,066 point of origin of the message, where this creation step further comprises the inclusion of a self-removing code in the message. Although we recognize that Hansen teaches the ability of a message originator to include codes within a message which may result in the removal of the message, the teachings in this reference indicate that it is not self-removing. Under the topic “4. Security” at the second column of page 28 of Hansen’s article, the article initially indicates that the Ness script is a program and then teaches the following (bottom of column 2): The Ness implementation has features that make it more difficult--though by no means impossible--for a villain to damage an unwary user. In particular, no script is ever executed--or even compiled--without permission from the reader. Users may choose among two options for this protection. This same teaching is conveyed to the reader at the top of the second column at page 29: Finally, the design must provide some control so nefarious authors are not as free to produce programs which can damage readers’ files. With Ness, the reader has the option to empower a script or not and also the Scan mode which aids in reviewing the script for potentially dangerous statements. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007