Ex Parte LI - Page 1





                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and           
                                                  is not binding precedent of the Board.                                           
                                                                                                         Paper No. 22              
                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                           ____________                                                            
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                           ____________                                                            
                                                      Ex parte THOMAS Z. LI                                                        
                                                           ____________                                                            
                                                       Appeal No. 2002-1751                                                        
                                                    Application No. 09/098,679                                                     
                                                           ____________                                                            
                                                             ON BRIEF                                                              
                                                           ____________                                                            
               Before WINTERS, TIMM, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                     
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                  



                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            
                       This appeal involves claims 1-16 which are all the claims pending in the application.  We                   
               have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                      
                                                       INTRODUCTION                                                                
                       The claims are directed to processes for improving the stability of glycerin and the                        
               products made by those processes.  According to Appellant, glycerin oxidatively degrades upon                       
               prolonged storage or upon heating during finished good processing (specification, pp. 4-5).  The                    
               degradation results in unwanted discoloration (specification, p. 5).  Appellant adjusts the pH of                   






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007