Ex Parte REISO et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      


                                                            Paper No. 26              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                               Ex parte ODDVIN REISO,                                 
                            ULF TUNDAL, JOHN ERIK HAFSAS                              
                                         and                                          
                                   ODDGEIR SJOTHUN                                    
                                   _______________                                    
                                Appeal No. 2002-1752                                  
                             Application No. 09/180,464                               
                                   _______________                                    
                               HEARD: January 8, 2003                                 
                                   _______________                                    

          Before WARREN, DELMENDO and POTEATE, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                  
          examiner’s refusal to allow claims 11, 12, 14-16, 27 and 28,                
          which are all of the claims remaining in the application.                   


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007