Ex Parte ZAWALICK - Page 2




                Appeal No. 2002-1763                                                                               Page 2                  
                Application No. 09/267,149                                                                                                 


                                               THE CLAIMED SUBJECT MATTER                                                                  
                        Claim 45, the only independent claim, is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal:                             
                        45.  A method for preserving a petroleum-based liquid product containing atmospheric                               
                oxygen in the head space during storage comprising the steps of:                                                           
                        (a)     displacing substantially all atmospheric oxygen from the head space of a container                         
                                containing said product using an inert gas or blend of inert gases, said gas or said                       
                                blend being heavier than atmospheric oxygen; and                                                           
                        (b)     dispensing inert gas or said blend of inert gases is into said container from an                           
                                aerosol can; and                                                                                           
                        (c)     sealing said container for storage after said atmospheric oxygen has been                                  
                                displaced from said container with said gas or said blend.                                                 

                                                           THE EVIDENCE                                                                    
                        As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies upon the following prior art                                   
                references:                                                                                                                
                Zinke                                    3,878,664                                 Apr. 22, 1975                           
                Perlman                                  5,060,823                                 Oct. 29, 1991                           
                Marano et al. (Marano)                   5,452,563                                 Sep. 26, 1995                           
                                                         THE REJECTIONS                                                                    
                        Claims 45-51 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over: (1)                               
                Marano in view of Perlman and (2) Zinke in view of Perlman.  We reverse with respect to both                               
                rejections for the following reasons.                                                                                      


                                                               OPINION                                                                     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007