Ex Parte SACCANI - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   
                                                                                      Paper No. 20            
                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                       Ex parte RICHARD LEE SACCANI                                           
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                             Appeal No. 2002-1807                                             
                                           Application No. 09/247,419                                         
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
            Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
            ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              



                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 5 and        
            18-26.  Claims 2-4, 11, 12, 27 and 28 have been canceled, claims 29 and 30 have been              
            allowed, and claims 6-10 and 13-17 have been objected to as containing allowable                  
            subject matter but being dependent upon a rejected claim.                                         


                   We REVERSE.                                                                                









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007