Ex Parte DATH et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1863                                                        
          Application No. 09/206,207                                                  


          an olefin-containing feedstock containing at least 100 parts per            
          million (ppm) of an impurity selected from the group consisting of          
          nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen using a pretreated MFI crystalline              
          catalyst under particular cracking conditions (Brief, page 3).  The         
          invention may be further understood by illustrative independent             
          claim 1, reproduced below:                                                  
               1.  A process for the catalytic cracking of at least one               
          olefin in an olefinic stream containing impurities, the cracking            
          process being selective towards light olefins in the effluent, the          
          process comprising contacting at an inlet temperature of from 500           
          to 600/C a feedstock olefinic stream containing at least 100 ppm            
          of at least one impurity selected from the group consisting of              
          nitrogen, sulphur and oxygen with a MFI crystalline silicate                
          catalyst, the catalyst having been heated in steam to reduce the            
          tetrahedral aluminum in the crystalline silicate framework and              
          subjected to an aluminum extraction process to remove aluminum from         
          the pores of the crystalline silicate after which the catalyst has          
          a silicon/aluminum atomic ratio of from 180 to 1000, to produce an          
          effluent stream having substantially the same olefinic content by           
          weight as, but a different olefin distribution than, the feedstock          
          contains.                                                                   
               The examiner relies upon the following references as evidence          
          of obviousness:                                                             
          Eberly, Jr., et al. (Eberly)     3,506,400          Apr. 14, 1970           
          Glockner et al. (Glockner)       4,078,011          Mar. 07, 1978           
          Colombo et al. (EP ‘060)         0 109 060          May 23, 1984            
          (published European Patent Application)                                     
               Claims 1, 2, 6-9, 12, 13, 15, 17-19 and 27 stand rejected              
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over EP ‘060 in view of            
          Eberly (Answer, page 3).  Claims 16 and 20-26 stand rejected under          

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007