Ex Parte PIETSCH et al - Page 6




              Appeal No. 2002-1866                                                               Page 6                
              Application No. 09/346,814                                                                               


                     Shisgal discloses a system for warning the driver of a vehicle of the presence of                 
              obstacles behind the vehicle.  Included in Shisgal is the teaching that power is supplied                
              to the warning system when the vehicle is placed in a reverse gear (column 6, lines 1-                   
              5).  However, it appears to us that such a teaching also is present in Wieder, wherein a                 
              sensor checks to determine that the vehicle is moving in reverse on the basis of the                     
              selected gear before it activates the warning system (column 3, lines 61-64).  We                        
              therefore agree with the examiner that it would have been obvious to operate the                         
              system only when the vehicle is traveling in the reverse direction.2                                     
                     With regard to claim 21, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we are not                   
              persuaded by the examiner’s statement on page 5 of the Answer (quoted above) that it                     
              would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the Wieder system                  
              to meet the terms of claim 21, which would require (1) establishing three control zones,                 
              (2) specifying that the distances of the three control zones be those recited in the claim,              
              (3) limiting the speed of the vehicle in each of the three control zones to velocity values              
              assigned to each zone, and (4) relating the velocity values to one another in the manner                 
              specified in the claim.  To do so would, in our view, necessitate a reconstruction of such               
              magnitude as to essentially discard the Wieder system as disclosed in the patent.                        

                     2 Interestingly, review of  the Shisgal patent brought to our attention the fact that Shisgal     
              establishes three warning zones based upon the proximity of the vehicle to the obstruction (column 3,    
              lines 17-22).  However, Shisgal does not overcome the deficiencies in Wieder because it does not sense   
              the speed of the vehicle and does not automatically control the vehicle, but merely indicates to the driver
              the zone through which the vehicle is backing by illuminating a light of a particular color, thus allowing the
              driver to control the vehicle manually as necessary.                                                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007