Ex Parte HWANG - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      


                                                            Paper No. 21              



                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     
                               Ex parte DEOG-WON HWANG                                
                                                                                     
                                Appeal No. 2002-1910                                  
                               Application 08/901,409                                 
                                                                                     
                                 HEARD: May 8, 2003                                   
                                                                                     
          Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1            
          through 10.  In an Amendment After Final1 (paper number 8),                 
          claim 1 was amended.                                                        



          1 After submission of the amendment, the examiner withdrew                  
          the indefiniteness rejection of claims 2 through 4 (paper                   
          number 9).                                                                  
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007