Appeal No. 2002-1917 Application 09/418,509 In summary, we find that the examiner has established a prima facie case of anticipation with respect to each of the claims on appeal, and appellants have failed to challenge this prima facie case with any substantive arguments. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-37 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) JERRY SMITH ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) STUART S. LEVY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JS/ki -6-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007