Appeal No. 2002-1950 Page 7
Application No. 09/234,514
on the objects, the examiner fails to present a prima facie case of obviousness.
Therefore, we reverse the obviousness rejection of claims 3, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 26.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 1, 4-10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 24-25, and 27 under
§ 102(b) and the rejection of claims 3, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 26 under § 103(a) are
reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007