Ex Parte CHRIST-JANER - Page 4




              Appeal No. 2002-1972                                                                Page 4                
              Application No. 09/394,722                                                                                


                     The appellant’s claims are directed to an emblem comprising a disc having                          
              obverse and reverse faces, each of which is divided by a sigmoid line into substantially                  
              equal adjoining forms having a major portion and a minor portion.  The major portion of                   
              each form is displaced with respect to the other in order to shape the emblem into a                      
              pair of oppositely oriented elevated sections, each of which has a depressed portion on                   
              its opposite side.  Thus, the claims describe an emblem having a particular structure.                    
              The appellant has explained the concept of yang and yin on pages 1-5 of the                               
              specification, and then goes on to state on page 5 that the emblem “allows for visual                     
              apprehension of the [Tao] law of polarity, of black and white, and of something                           
              masculine in the feminine, and something of the feminine in the masculine,” and                           
              “provides a three-dimensional representation of the yang-yin principle whereby the                        
              principle may be experienced through sight as well as touch . . . [which] serves as a                     
              constant reminder of the bipolar nature of cosmic energy, facilitates meditation of                       
              intuitive realization of being one with the Tao, sensing large and small manifestations of                
              oneness with the Tao, and harmonizing the yang-yin energies in the body.”                                 
                     The appellant’s claims clearly recite an object having specifically defined                        
              structural features. In the above-noted portions of the appellant’s specification the                     
              appellant has asserted that the object described in the claims has utility in that it                     
              provides a three-dimensional representation of the Tao which can be seen and                              
              touched.  While the examiner has taken the position that this does not constitute “utility”               








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007